Law Code of Hammurabi

Everything and of solely beaty star has a history. Things and materials do not just appear on this earth. They all nurse beginning. Its very interesting to see where things got started. How we came to evolve to the way we are today. Everything is so interesting, barely the thing that has caught my attention more is The polity of Hammurabi. According to Judith Levin, The law of Hammurabi was discovered in the winter of 1902 and 1903 while digging up the internet site of ancient city of Susa, pre displace day Iran. They found three large-mouthed shiny pieces of shiny black stone that formed a remembrance almost s pull down and a half feet tall (13).The writing was in the script of cuneiform. In essence The grave of Hammurabi was the initiative set of laws ever established. It was an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth kind of laws. You refineed somebodysomeone will kill you. Hammurabi was king of Babylon rough 4,000 years ago. Babylon was the land between the rivers, the r ivers being Tigris and the Euphrates. He proclaimed that he was Hammurabi, King of Justice. That he protected the weak low-down people, widows, orphans- from the powerful (Levin). I chose to compare some of the law legislations in Hammurabis fairness Codes and some amendments from the united States Constitution.The Code of Hammurabi was believed to be create verbally 1727 BCE (Constitutuion. org). The join States Constitution was ratified 1788. The Code of Hammurabi being one of the first written laws and regulations to the laws and regulations we live by today. I found interesting because knowing where we first started shows how much the benevolent race has changed. When it comes to the characteristics the linked States Constitution and Hammurabis Law Code vex in common two, obviously, are sets of laws. This means that they both pee-pee decrees that must be followed.Also, the purpose of both of these laws is to protect and receive justice to the people to whom the or ders shall apply. Some basic differences are the severity of rules and punishments. The Code of Hammurabi is kind of extreme. The Code of Hammurabi was a primitive and cruel justice arranging that relied on fear to hold back the populace in line. Hammurabi claimed he was sent by a god to rule, so therefore, no one would query his authority. Religion alone was not enough to keep the people in line, so Hammurabi created a code of laws that would scare the people into obedience.Breaking the laws resulted in an inhumane or exaggerated punishment. Common human error was tough as a crime, and could spend a penny severe consequences. The people lived in unending fear of the law. The justice system claimed to puzzle an eye for an eye mentality, but it often seemed that it was a life for an eye. Killing a man for committing looting is extreme he could just be picking a pocket, or else than robbing a bank. Cutting of an despatchenders hand was a common punishment for delicate crimes . If a son strikes his father, his hand shall be cut off.This is done regardless of the circumstances, considering the father could be beating the son. Am tellating a hand often direct to remainder, for there was no medicine to stop the bleeding. The court attempted to keep people from bearing out of true run into, by giving severe penalties. If a man cannot put up that the man he is accusing of murder is guilty, he shall be put to death. While this might deter citizens from make false accusations, it might cause an irreproachable man to be put to death because he could not find evidence. If someone were to bear false witness concerning grain or money, he shall put death.A little extreme, considering it could be concerning pocket change. Sentences like this would cause the people to be afraid to condense up for their rights in court. Severe penalties were often inflicted in cases of common human error. If a physician were to cause a mans death while operating, he would lose his hand. Physicians who try to do well are punished for making mistakes. Once they lose their hand, they cannot operate again. A bit harsh in my opinion. On the other hand, the United States Constitution isnt as extreme. Its not perfect, but nothing really. There is always going to be flaws.The United States Constitution covers all the almost all the laws as the code of Hammurabi, but not so extreme. With the Law of Hammurabi, only one somebody could decide the persons fate. With the Constitution, we the people have the right to have someone defend us in court. We have the right to be tried by a grand jury versus the judge himself/herself. We have many more options to protect ourselves. We have rights that follow us all through the process. For example, once we get arrested we have our Miranda rights we have a time limit as to how long they can keep us low custody.For example, once arrested, if we dont see a judge with a certain amount of hours they have to let us go. With the co de of Hammurabi, you stood trial. If one person and one person only believed you were guilty, then not stock-still God would save you. If the judge couldnt determine who was the guilty and who the innocent was, you had to do some extreme things that were totally uncalled for. For example, if any one bear an accusation against a man, and the accused go to the river and leap into the river, if he square off in the river his accuser shall take possession of his house.But if the river prove that the accused is not guilty, and he escape unhurt, then he who had brought the accusation shall be put to death, while he who leaped into the river shall take possession of the house that had belonged to his accuser (King). Something interesting about both of them is their regulations for people who tell lies against other people. Under Hammurabis rule if someone came forward to accuse someone else of a crime, they better have the means of evidence to back it up or there would be consequences.F or example, if I came forward and accused Ben of stealing, if I cant prove Ben was stealing then my punishment for lying would be the punishment Ben would have gotten if he really was stealing. Under the Code of Hammurabi this is getting my hand tricksy off (Legal History and Philosophy). So people were pretty spectical about access forward and accusing people with crimes if they didnt have rock rocky evidence. Under the United States Constitution, there is a charge and penatly for lying or give the police unreliable information and it conflicts with an investigation.If it might give us a misdemeanor but nothing major like groovy off someones hand. Hammurabis Code was stricter and less tolerant. The United states Constitution is strict but it has its parameters. It doesnt just go off on a killing spree for everyone crime in the book. The Code of Hammurabi, most of the consequences for the crimes is death. Thats kind of harsh. Everyone under Hammurabis reign became present citiz ens, expert liars, or were extinct with the rest of the population he was killing. population were afraid to do anything. He called himself the defender of middle class and the little but in reality he didnt protect them.He fined the rich because they had the money to compensation, if they got caught up in a crime all they had to to do was pay. When the poor got involved with crimes they didnt have money to pay up so they were punished with other meanslike bully of f a hand, being put to death, etc. It is good that someone did establish laws starting with if. Instead of having something is just illegal or jet shall not The Hammurabi Codes were actually set realistically. The punishments might have not been but they started off good. If this crime is committed, then this is the punishment. They were realistic that even if they declared something illegal someone was still going to break the law. The United States Constitution, was built over many years and many people. They just didnt write one thing down and leave it like that. They got inclined to the changes of the world. Rules and regulations were later added to adjust to the changing world. In Conclusion, The Code of Hammurabi is what got the law started in a way. But the United States Constitution is how far along it was come. Everything take a start. Hammurabi was the start. things evolve and change with time. We all adapt.