Enginnering Ethics Paper -- Engineering

In order for an applied scientisting science concept to be considered innovative it must be a recent method or product but it can also be a modification to an existing method or product. Generally the depart of vicissitude is to overcome a new obstacle or to rectify upon a current solution to any public figure. For the purpose of this paper grounding will not be defined only as an improvement. However, the designing whitethorn cause new problems to arise. Given this situation the engineer may not have taken all the necessary steps to correspond the success of the application of the new design. In this paper one such engineer (William LeMessurier) and design concept will be discussed. The definition of macrocosm in the engineering report will be developed and the interview of whether or not there are additional obligations imposed on the engineer as a result of innovation will be addressed.It was previously stated that innovation produces new problems which still holds t rue, but the bidding may cause confusion given the definition of innovation as compared to the definition of invention. Invention is the generation of an idea while innovation is the seek implementation of that idea. Having established general definitions an expansion on the definition of innovation is needed. An idea cannot be considered innovative if the application is unsuccessful. In order for a concept to be considered innovative it has to meet the design criteria. An innovative design must possess or more of the following characteristics unusual, ground breaking, myth or a significant transformation from the previous design.In the field of engineering the distinction between innovative and non-innovative designs is based mostly on pioneering. The purpose of an engineer is to improv... ...tated that the night welding was the result of an upgrade to consult a recent change in the NYC building codes2. This statement was unserviceable but not irresponsible. The public health , safety and welfare were not snub in association with the Citicorp design. Precautions were taken and information was shared among those in a position to make an impact. Informing the public of a design defacement would most likely cause panic and great economic loss. The engineer LeMessurier acted responsibly on his part. As the lead engineer public traffic and press releases are not his responsibility.References1. Innovation.. Britannica Family Encyclopedia. Chicago Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008.2. E. HARRIS and R. JAMES, ENGR 482 Class Notes, Texas A&M University (Fall 2009).3. HARRIS,PRITCHARD, RABINS, Engineering Ethics, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Belmont (2009)