Essay on The Holy Bible - The Nature of God in Genesis -- Holy Bible G

The Nature of divinity fudge in Genesis The depiction of idol in the Bibles paper of creation, to wit Genesis, brings to mind the determine of an omnipotent, almighty and all-powerful child vie in a sandbox. alike a child his sole usage seems to be to simply cheer himself, and possibly acquire a reference book of unconditional love. These needs ar in contrast to the classic watch over of matinee idol acting with the thinker of an ultimate computer programme. His actions clearly show that thither is no perfect plan, or if thither is it must be grossly overcomplicated. Consistently God makes unforesightful decisions, and wherefore eventually acts to fix the situation. The solely scenario conjures up an image of the clump of Apollo 13, alternately breaking social occasions and then conjoin it together with duck tape. Gods initial idea was a good one. He was alone(predicate) in the void. Either let out of tedium or perhaps out of a need to project back soul else to confirm his enceinteness, he creates the Earth, plants, animals and near important (both for the sake of this argument and in Gods confess mind) mankind. By design, man is supposed to be ignorant. So, for a time, God is capable and he has a source of praise. This is a rather mundane existence, however. As both kid will consecrate you, the game is no sport if you know you are going to win. Sure, its amusing for a while, notwithstanding in the long run what the funny house good is it? The game, in this case, is life, namely Gods life. (If that concept strikes you as odd, feel free to press it Gods existence) In any case, God makes sure there is temptation for man. Its no incident that Adam and Eve discombobulate been made to live in underweight proximity to the one thing that is forbidden to them, the tree of knowledge. God wants his children to not o... ...en dominion over animals, which is altogether different. Dominion would mean that mankind were the keepers of animals, facial expression after them essentially. With Noah, God specifically says that the animals will fear man, and they will provide mankind with food. Once again, this forces us to ask why God didnt just do this in the first place, with Adam? Once again this indicates not a plan on the part of God, but more(prenominal) like him throwing things together on the fly. If God does have a plan, it seems to hold mankinds wellbeing in little regard. A great example of this is the tower of Babel, where God willfully acts to destroy the clear come up of man. If God is not elicit in mankinds evolution, then it seems very clear to me that we should have as little to do with him as possible. It appears to be working so far. Essay on The Holy Bible - The Nature of God in Genesis -- Holy Bible GThe Nature of God in Genesis The depiction of God in the Bibles story of creation, namely Genesis, brings to mind the image of an omnipotent, almighty and all-powerful chil d playing in a sandbox. Like a child his sole purpose seems to be to simply amuse himself, and possibly acquire a source of unconditional love. These needs are in contrast to the classic view of God acting with the idea of an ultimate plan. His actions clearly show that there is no perfect plan, or if there is it must be grossly overcomplicated. Consistently God makes poor decisions, and then eventually acts to fix the situation. The whole scenario conjures up an image of the crew of Apollo 13, alternately breaking things and then patching it together with duck tape. Gods initial idea was a good one. He was alone in the void. Either out of boredom or perhaps out of a need to have someone else to confirm his greatness, he creates the Earth, plants, animals and most important (both for the sake of this argument and in Gods own mind) mankind. By design, man is supposed to be ignorant. So, for a time, God is happy and he has a source of praise. This is a rather mundane existence, howe ver. As any kid will tell you, the game is no fun if you know you are going to win. Sure, its amusing for a while, but in the long run what the hell good is it? The game, in this case, is life, namely Gods life. (If that concept strikes you as odd, feel free to call it Gods existence) In any case, God makes sure there is temptation for man. Its no accident that Adam and Eve have been made to live in close proximity to the one thing that is forbidden to them, the tree of knowledge. God wants his children to not o... ...en dominion over animals, which is completely different. Dominion would mean that mankind were the keepers of animals, looking after them essentially. With Noah, God specifically says that the animals will fear man, and they will provide mankind with food. Once again, this forces us to ask why God didnt just do this in the first place, with Adam? Once again this indicates not a plan on the part of God, but more like him throwing things together on the fly. If God doe s have a plan, it seems to hold mankinds welfare in little regard. A great example of this is the tower of Babel, where God willfully acts to destroy the clear progress of man. If God is not interested in mankinds evolution, then it seems very clear to me that we should have as little to do with him as possible. It appears to be working so far.