Correctional Subculture Essay

The correctional subculture has various ethical questions pertaining to a correction military officer and his duties. According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), when an officer makes the decision to reprimand or write a disciplinary report, he is playing a fiber in the Criminal Justice System (p. 316). A disciplinary mission also has a dilemma because he, or she must decide on what punishment should accrue towards the offender. This may be a temporary neediness of privileges, or he may have his sentence increased (p. 316, para. 2). A correctional officer in uniform is an authority figure, which implies reasonable and sage take over the incarcerated. Moreover, he has the full range of coercive control over cons excessive force, loss of liberty, and his power may be noncompliant taught through his subculture (other correctional officers).According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), many correctional officers have (deontological) special knowledge and practice professionalism. W hile others tend to use (teleological) coercive, control a puckerst offenders gain advantage (pp. 317-318). A correctional officer must engage in ethical behavior. He must act professional show jimmy for the incarcerated be consistent maintain integrity and honesty and act simple (p. 318).The subculture of a correctional officer has similar aspects of patrol subculture. However, cover-ups and wrongdoing is patent in both. According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), a correctional officer impart exit to administer aid for another officer. Again, as police officers, correctional officers will not cooperate in an investigation if it pertains to a fellow officer (blue code). One would not embarrass another in front of an offender because this may jeopardize an officers effectiveness. A fellow officer does not indulge in a white hat. This pertains to showing emotions towards an inmate or his family. A main similarity between correctional and police officers is that both engage in so lidarity, against all outside groups (pp. 320-321).In conclusion, few officers endorse and publicize subcultural values, whereas the majorities, who argon silent, privately believe in distinct values. In fact, his ethical motive tend to make judgments on their own. This can be base onhis religion what is good or bad based on what is morally wrong, utilitarianism a bad action turning into a good deed (a selfless act), natural law universally delightful and ethical formalism the intent of good will. According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), correctional officers are faced with these dilemmas on a daily basis.Moreover, the difference between holiness and justice comes not from the difference between actions and consequences (as between morality and mold ethics) but from the difference between motives and actions (pp. 325-327). Therefore, when a C.O. does not practice morals and does not follow the ethical code he may mishandle into relativistic egoism. He may believe he should r eceive benefits for his trouble, and he does not think of the latter consequences to his actions.ReferencesAxia College of University of Phoenix. (2005). Chapter 11 Ethics in nuisance and Justice, Ethics for Correctional Professions. Retrieved October 6, 2008, fromAxia College, Week Eight reading AXcess, ADJ 235- Ethics and the tribunal of Justice