.

Friday, March 15, 2019

Animal Experimentation and Research Essay -- Ethics Morals Essays Pape

living creature Experimentation and ResearchIn the wine cellar of the psychology department here, a poster hangs on the wall on it is a picture of two white lab rats and a legend that reads, ?They?ve saved more lives than 911.? This poster hangs on the wall of the room where I performed brain surgery on a rat. Many people would be morally opposed to this and any other form of animal seek and experiment and experience that it should be banned. This heated palisade has been going on for centuries with each side possessing strong arguments. A central argument to this debate is whether or not animals are moral patients, with feelings anId the ability to suffer, and if we as world are entitled to use them as means. Many people feel that we have made great medical advancements that would not have been mathematical without the use of animals. Alternatively, some feel that despite the medical advancements made, the use of animals stiff an unethical practice. I feel that anima l experimentation has the capacity to be very beneficial to medical research. However, scientists should try to prevent as oftentimes suffering as possible. Likewise, it would be a good idea to disallow unnecessary testing and experimentation, especially with the recent development of many alternatives. notwithstanding mounting controversy, many people still find animal experimentation to be a moral and correct practice. A widely trustworthy thought of some philosophers is that animals are not morally equal to us therefore, we do not have to treat them as such (Fox, 3). Furthermore, correspond to Michael Allen Fox, author of The Case for Animal Experimentation, ?animals fail to meet the conditions specified for affluent membership in the moral community and likewise fail to... ...on, this exhaust will be able to be solved and a worldwide understanding and agreement can arise.Works Cited Birke, Lynda and Michael, Mike. ?Ethics and Animal Rights blow over Beyond U K Law.? Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy leaping 35-38 Fox, Michael Allen. The Case for Animal Experimentation. Berkley University of California Press, 1986. Langley, Gill, ed.. Animal Experimentation The Consensus Changes. New York Chapman and Hall, 1989. Mench, Joy. ?Animal Research Arouses Passion, Sparks.? Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy make 1996 5-15. Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York McGraw-Hill, 2003. ?Rights from Wrongs.? The Environmental Magazine. March/April. 2008 26-33. Singer, Peter. Practical Ethics. New York Cambridge University Press, 1999.

No comments:

Post a Comment